ADCY5: The Movement Disorder You’ve Never Heard Of

There are several movement disorders that affect the human body; some of these disorders are well known, like Parkinson’s Disease, Huntington’s Disease, Multiple System Atrophy, and Essential Tremor. Many of these disorders share overlapping symptoms and are often mistaken, as early onset or in later stages of life, for Parkinson’s disease. These similarities can include muscle stiffness or rigidity, tremors, gait, and balance problems. However, to the casual observer, the outward movements of the body may look alike, but the diseases behind them are not the same. 

What is the ADCY5-related disorder?

One of the rarest movement disorders that most of us have never heard of is known as the ADCY5-related disorder (ADCY5-RD) or ADCY5-related movement disorders. (ADCY5-RMD)  In an article posted on Neurology Journals – Pearls & Oy-sters: ADCY5-Related Dyskinesia,  “ADCY5-RD is described as a rare hyperkinetic movement disorder characterized by infantile to late-adolescent onset of chorea, athetosis, dystonia, myoclonus, or a combination of these resulting from pathogenic variants in the ADCY5 gene.” 

There isn’t a precise number of people worldwide who have this disease, but some estimates put the number of documented cases at 400 to 450. A study posted on the NIH’s National Library of Medicine puts the number at less than one case per million globally, suggesting a few thousand people worldwide at most, in part due to undocumented and undiagnosed cases. Some researchers feel that as genetic sequencing becomes more readily available, clinicians are identifying novel and atypical presentations, suggesting the real number may be higher than currently documented. Based on known cases compared with the global population, and running the numbers through AI, a conservative lower-bound estimate is roughly:

~1 in 10–20 million people

A simpler definition of the disease can be explained like this: ADCY5-RD is a movement disorder that typically begins in infancy, childhood, or teenage years due to a mutation in the ADCY5 gene. It causes involuntary hard-to-control movements such as jerking, twisting, or writhing motions, and sometimes muscle stiffness or sudden muscle spasms. A person only needs to inherit the genetic mutation from one parent to develop the condition, unlike other movement disorders, such as Wilson’s disease or Friedreich’s ataxia, and doesn’t require a family history of the disease to get it.

Yen, Y.C., Tesmer, J.J.G. 2024 Nat Struct Mol Biol 31: 1189-1197 https://www.rcsb.org/structure/8SL4

Diagnosis

 A paper published on the NIH’s National Center for Biotechnology Information website, ADCY5-related movement disorder are dignosised with a genetic test that looks for changes in the ADCY5 gene. Most people have one changed copy, while a small number have changes in both copies. The paper also states that “No consensus clinical diagnostic criteria for ADCY5-related movement disorder (ADCY5-MD) have been published.” They do offer “Suggestive Findings” that physicians and others should be on the lookout for; some of these are: Axial hypotonia and weakness, Lower-limb spasticity with pyramidal signs, delayed motor and speech development, persistence of dyskinesia during sleep, and more, as listed here.

Symptoms

ADCY5 is a movement disorder known as hyperkinetic, meaning when the body moves more than intended, often without the person trying to move at all. Common features of this disease are dance-like, flowing movements called Chorea, Dystonia (sustained muscle contractions and abnormal postures common in other disorders like Parkinson’s Disease, Multiple System Atrophy, and Huntington’s Disease), sudden jerking known as Myoclonus, and facial movements like grimacing and jaw movements.  Unlike other movement disorders, the symptoms of ADCY5-RD are closely related to sleep, often appearing when the body should be at rest. Researchers point out that these movements can be triggered by the “initial stages of NREM sleep, REM sleep, and/or by the sleep-wake transition.” Researchers also indicate symptoms may be triggered by drowsiness, awakenings, or several other conditions, such as concurrent illnesses, emotions, anxiety, stress, tiredness, laughter, sneezing, and/or medications.

What ADCY5 is Not

Unlike the previously mentioned movement disorders, ADCY5-RD is not neurodegenerative. It doesn’t cause progressive brain damage over time because it does not involve widespread loss of brain cells, even though the symptoms of this disease may lessen or worsen with time. Symptoms will increase when a person is exposed to triggers like stress, illiness or by experiencing sleep disruption. In technological terms, think of ADCY5-related disorder as a software problem rather than a hardware failure. The brain’s structure remains intact, but the signals controlling movement don’t always fire smoothly. The system isn’t breaking down; it’s misfiring.

Treatments 

Like many other movement disorders currently being diagnosed and managed, there is no known cure for this disease yet, but several treatment options are available that may reduce symptoms. Medications like Benzodiazepines (a class of medications designed to slow down overactive brain activity, reduce anxiety, relax muscles, and control seizures or severe muscle spasms), Anticholinergics (medications that reduce overactive nerve signals by blocking acetylcholine (a neurotransmitter), which help calm certain involuntary movements, muscle spasms, or tremors). 

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is also being used as a treatment for patients who have severe, disabling symptoms and don’t respond well to medications, very similar to those with Parkinson’s Disease. DBS targets the globus pallidus internus (GPi) (a deep brain structure that helps control movement), which works by modulating abnormal brain signaling in regions involved in movement control, such as the basal ganglia. DBS is aimed at improving symptoms, not stopping disease progression. 

Some of the other treatments published on the NIH website include physical and occupational therapy, speech-language therapy, physical medicine and rehabilitation, and management of neurobehavioral/psychiatric manifestations by mental health professionals. 

ADCY5-related disorder illustrates how movement disorders are not all the same; those that look similar to the naked eye can be driven by very different disease processes underneath. As genetic testing becomes more widely available, more patients may be accurately diagnosed instead of being mistaken for more common conditions like Parkinson’s disease. While there is currently no cure for any of the movement disorders that are known to medicine, current treatments and therapies are aimed at improving symptoms, while researchers now explore whole body solutions in order to diagnose the underlying causes of many movement disorders and develop more targeted, effective treatments.

In technological terms, ADCY5-related disorder is best understood as a software problem rather than a hardware failure: the brain’s structure remains intact, but the signals controlling movement do not always fire smoothly. The system is not breaking down; it is misfiring, and understanding that difference is critical to how this disease is diagnosed, managed, and studied moving forward.

Find out more about what ADCY5 is and how the mutation in the gene works at https://www.adcy5.org/adcy5

Unless noted, all media by Chris Denny/Adobe

Current Essential Tremor Medication Based on Outdated Standards

A not-so-stellar report was released on the effectiveness of drugs aimed at relieving symptoms for Essential Tremor (ET). The study, titled “Update on Medical Treatments for Essential Tremor: An International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society Evidence-Based Medicine Review” by the International Parkinson and Movement International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society, outlines how ET medications reviewed as part of the study ended up with an “insufficient evidence” rating, meaning the data did not meet today’s standards for high-quality clinical research, including medications neurologists prescribe every day. In many cases, treatments showed statistical improvement, but that did not translate into strong, reliable results under modern research standards.

What Is Essential Tremor

Research increasingly points to abnormal brain signaling, particularly involving the cerebellum, the part of the brain that coordinates movement and balance. In people with ET, the communication loops between the cerebellum, thalamus, and motor cortex don’t fire normally, leading to rhythmic, involuntary shaking.

Results of the Study

In its findings, the review acknowledges that many patients still report benefits from the two most commonly prescribed first-line medications, such as Propranolol and Primidone, based on small trials. However, researchers indicate, “We do not have high-quality, modern evidence proving they work well enough, long enough, in enough people.”

Researchers point to several reasons why the current medications for ET did not fare so well, including:

  • Small sample sizes
  • Older drug trials that predate CONSORT standards, which are designed to ensure clinical trials are reported clearly, completely, and honestly so results can be trusted and compared
  • High dropout rates due to side effects experienced by participants
  • Outcome scales that lacked consistency and standardization (tools used to measure whether a treatment is working)
  • Poor reporting of how participants were randomly assigned to treatment groups
  • Uncertainty around whether researchers knew which treatment a participant would receive ahead of time, raising the risk that assignments could be influenced, intentionally or not

Newer drugs, such as Topiramate, were tested in larger studies and produced improvements in tremor scores. However, frequent cognitive side effects and high discontinuation rates raised doubts about how meaningful those improvements were in a patient’s everyday life.

Medications such as Botulinum toxin A reduced tremor in some individuals, though hand weakness and the risk of unblinding made results difficult to interpret. Other medications either showed benefit in only a single small trial or failed to demonstrate meaningful improvement at all. In the end, every medication reviewed received an “insufficient evidence” rating with low certainty.

Based on these findings, the research indicates that much of the evidence underlying current ET medications is fragile and outdated, leaving many uncertain about what actually works.

At its core, the study makes a simple point: Essential Tremor is one of the most common movement disorders in the world, yet it is still being treated with medications that have never been properly tested by modern standards. Placing many current ET treatments into a category of “legacy medicine” built on outdated trials.

The results also point to the need for future trials that prioritize larger sample sizes, transparent reporting, and revisions to the scales currently used to measure ET, including the Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS), the Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST), and the Fahn–Tolosa–Marín Tremor Rating Scale (FTM). Many ET medications fail to show consistent, meaningful improvement, even when tremor scores appear to improve on paper.

The report also highlights the difficulty of standardizing outcomes for people with ET, given differences in tremor severity, daily functioning, and quality of life. Researchers note that “Essential tremor can have a significant impact on daily functioning, hindering independence in both personal and professional life.” People with ET face increasing risks of anxiety, depression, and social isolation. These challenges often drive reduced social participation and public engagement, leading many to pull back from work, relationships, and everyday activities.

Necessary Changes Needed

Researchers conclude that “There is an urgent need for longer and better-designed clinical trials in essential tremor” and that Future trials should follow contemporary standards in clinical trial methodology with adequately powered studies and clinically meaningful outcome measures.” because “Adequate follow-up durations are needed to provide robust information on therapeutic efficacy and safety for a chronic condition such as essential tremor. This review is not intended to serve as a guideline for the treatment of ET but rather to provide an evidence-based synthesis of the available interventions and their efficacy using the best quality available data and a rigorous evaluation of the strengths and limitations. The current conclusions should be considered one of many sources of information prescribing healthcare professionals may consider for management decisions in ET.”

In a public statement by neurologist, Dr. Michael Okun of the Norman Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases and co-author of A Parkinson’s Plan on LinkedIn: “This is an important and sobering update. Essential tremor is common, disabling, and frequently under-treated, yet our evidence base has not kept pace w/ the clinical need. Treatments do not help some folks, and we urgently need better-designed, longer, and more meaningful trials.”

How Essential Tremor Is Perceived

ET has long been classified as a benign condition and, as a result, has not received the level of attention some feel it deserves compared to diseases such as Parkinson’s disease, ALS, or Huntington’s disease. It receives less funding than Parkinson’s disease; studies are often shorter in duration, and there is less urgency among some researchers, funding agencies, and institutions that shape research priorities. Unlike Parkinson’s disease, Essential Tremor also lacks a widely recognized public figure to anchor public awareness, which has likely contributed to lower research funding and visibility.

In short, Essential Tremor is not a fatal disease, and because of that, it often takes a back seat to more life-threatening neurological conditions. Public perception must change if treatment approaches and research priorities are going to change as well.

Learn more about Essential Tremor and support patient education and research through the International Essential Tremor Foundation.

Understanding Parkinson’s Disease Through the Lens of Aging – Part 2

The role of aging in Parkinson’s disease continues to receive renewed attention from some of the field’s most prominent researchers and clinicians. More of them believe that the disease is, in part, a failure of the biological clock that keeps our bodies running, with outside environmental factors changing and disrupting those processes.

This idea has been discussed in peer-reviewed research for several years. In a review published in the NIH’s National Library of Medicine from 2011, researchers argued that the normal loss of dopamine-producing neurons in Parkinson’s Disease are driven by similar mechanisms, creating an age-induced pre-Parkinson’s state and, in turn, setting up the brain to make it more vulnerable to genetic and environmental factors.  As the authors put it, “Parkinson’s pathology may be necessary, but aging determines when and how badly it manifests.” Aging alone does not cause Parkinson’s, but it may influence when symptoms begin and how severe they become once other disease-driving factors are present, long before Parkinson’s symptoms appear.

While aging may create biological conditions that increase the body’s risk of many diseases, it does not cause Parkinson’s on its own, a point echoed by Dr. Ray Dorsey, of the Atria Health and Research Institute and co-author of The Parkinson’s Plan, who argues that environmental exposures, not aging itself, drive the disease. “Parkinson’s disease is not a natural consequence of aging; it is an unnatural one.” It is not just found in older men. It affects everyone. It is not predominantly due to genetics. Rather, chemicals in our food, water, and air have created this largely man-made disease.”

Taken together, these views point to a shift in how scientists think about preventing Parkinson’s and other age-related diseases. If aging shapes vulnerability rather than acting as a single cause, then slowing biological aging could delay multiple diseases at once, including Parkinson’s. While other research points to immune-based interventions with the ability to slow biological aging, reinforcing the idea that these processes may be modifiable rather than fixed. This idea is at the heart of what researchers call the geroscience hypothesis.

In the Journal of Gerontology from June 2023, Drugs Targeting Mechanisms of Aging to Delay Age-Related Disease and Promote Healthspan: Proceedings of a National Institute on Aging Workshop a hypothesis was posed, The geroscience hypothesis posits that by targeting key hallmarks of aging we may simultaneously prevent or delay several age-related diseases and thereby increase healthspan, or life span spent free of significant disease and disability.

Evidence supporting this approach is beginning to emerge from large population datasets. New research using data from the UK Biobank answers an important question when it comes to predicting how long people live with Parkinson’s Disease using biological data in a new study published in Nature Communications titled “Biological aging predicts mortality in Parkinson’s patients: evidence from UK Biobank.” Researchers have studied how “old” the body actually is at a cellular and systems level and found that it is a strong, independent predictor of mortality in Parkinson’s disease. 

The study, using a metric called Phenotypic Age (PhenoAge), compares the biological age of a person to their actual chronological age using blood biomarkers that doctors normally use to give them a current snapshot of how your body’s major systems are working. It checks your metabolism, organs, inflammation, blood health, hormones, LDL, HDL, triglycerides, glucose, and more. From these results, it can be determined how fast someone is biologically aging, either faster or slower than expected, based on their current age, in a process called PhenoAge Acceleration

Using UK Biobank data, researchers tracked 569 people with Parkinson’s disease for a median of just over nine years. The study found that those participants with higher biological age and faster biological aging were associated with an increased risk of death, while aging based on just physical age alone wasn’t nearly as impactful. 

Authors of this research state that “Although chronological age has been identified as a predictor of decreased survival in Parkinson’s disease, the biological mechanisms underlying this association remain only partially elucidated.” In other words, those older patients who have the disease tend to die sooner, but researchers are still trying to figure out why age affects survival at a biological level. 

The paper argues that researchers have mostly treated aging as just a number on a chart, rather than something happening inside the body, while biological aging acts as a living record, capturing the wear and tear a person’s body takes over a period of years that actually shape Parkinson’s outcomes. The study does point out that higher and faster biological ages point to a higher risk of death and shorter survival. 

Researchers conclude that: “Existing evidence suggests that aging is the strongest risk factor for PD. As PD is a systemic disorder, relying on individual aging biomarkers provides limited insight into whole-body aging.” The focus is on figuring out better ways to understand individuals who are at higher risk and how slowing down the body’s aging process could help reduce the impact of Parkinson’s disease.

Identifying individuals who are at high risk using biological aging could open the door for many by personalizing treatments and finding ways to slow down aging using existing therapies already in place. These include exercise programs like Rock Steady Boxing, anti-inflammatory strategies such as Mediterranean diets that emphasize fruits, vegetables, whole grains, fish, olive oil, and reducing ultra-processed foods that are incorporated into many prepackaged items today. Sleep optimization may also help slow the biological aging process. Poor sleep can accelerate biological aging by increasing inflammatory markers, while improving sleep can help slow that process.

 All of this being said, maintaining a healthy lifestyle may help prevent many diseases and slow the biological aging clock over time.

You can find the study, led by Yong-Ping Chen of the Department of Neurology and Institute of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China, here.

Unless noted, all media by Chris Denny/Adobe

Our World in Words and Film

Get new articles as they come out.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.